Twin Paradox in General Relativity

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjHLboK2M1g

>From the perspective of the people in the world outside of the EMF event
horizon, the speed that things are happening on or inside that horizon is
ultra-fast. But at that  horizon, the speed that things are happening is
occurring at a normal speed.

This difference in the perspective of time is why we see no nuclear
activity going on at or inside the EMF horizon.  These nuclear reactions
happen instantaneously from our perspective even if the radioactive isotope
takes billions of years to stabilize.

On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 5:16 PM Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:

> There is no telling what elements will be transformed by the LENR
> reaction. When the LENR active agent get hold of palladium and deuterium,
> silver might be formed rather than just helium. The mesh should be examined
> in a SEM scan to see if there is some non palladium elements present on the
> nickel mesh.
>
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 5:03 PM JonesBeene <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> *From: *Jürg Wyttenbach <[email protected]>
>>
>>
>>
>>    - In the Mizuno case we certainly will see 4-He with a 4-He a part >
>>    that 106 of the 3-He part.
>>
>>
>>
>> Jürg
>>
>>
>>
>> If Mizuno is producing helium then it should show up very distinctly when
>> he looks for it- since the total gas inventory is so low and the power is
>> so high that the ratio of He:D after along run will leave no doubt. As of
>> now – that evidence is lacking.
>>
>>
>>
>> It is too bad that we do not have more information now – as this
>> experiment is uniquely positioned to see it and if fount then it makes a
>> huge difference in what to expect from future devices. I’m on record as
>> predicting there will be none, well … only incidental Helium – possibly
>> unmeasurable.
>>
>>
>>
>> Mizuno clearly states nickel is the host reactant – not the tiny amount
>> of palladium.
>>
>>
>>
>> Where is the reliable evidence for helium being produced from
>> nickel/deuterium?
>>
>>
>>
>> Jones
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to