One of the reasons why superconductivity and LENR are so tightly connected is that it would be near impossible to gather and then subsequently maintain enough EMF power to produce an effective EMF event horizon. Dispersion of optical power would soon destroy the meta-stable concentration of EMF power upon which the LENR reaction depends. This is where ultra-dense matter comes into the LENR picture. This state of matter produces the state of superconductivity in the particles that make this special type of matter. LENR takes to this special highly supportive electromagnetic environment like bacteria take to a soup of supportive nutrients in a petri dish.
The LENR reaction can form in a non-superconductive situation, but it needs far more input energy pumping to maintain the density of sufficient polaritons that can sustain the associated development of an EMF event horizon. This weaken gathering of polariton density is where gammas and sundry nuclear reactive byproduct will manifest. On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 6:44 PM Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > The production of gammas and radioactive isotopes is like the production > of smoke in a weak fire that is just getting started. Once a fire gets > going with a vengeance and the combustion process has firmly set in, the > fire burns hottest with no smoke production. > > All the LENR old guard looked for the production of LENR smoke to prove to > the outsiders that LENR was actually occurring. But once the LENR reaction > set in strongly, there would be no LENR smoke to be had. The desire of the > LENR old guard for the LENR reaction to prove its existence through the > production of LENR smoke is counterproductive. > > On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 6:21 PM Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/21a1/9da6b2ac3da851177d2f4e93be88f73a330b.pdf >> >> Low Energy Nuclear Reactions resulting as picometer interactions with >> similarity to K-shell electron capture >> >> H. Hora, G.H. Miley have come up with a theory that explains how >> transmuted elements will form based on the quarks nature of matter. This is >> applicable to what the mechanism of matter formation must have been when >> elements first formed during the earliest times just after the big bang. >> The way matter forms now inside the LENR reaction at the EMF event horizon >> is the same as it had occurred just after the big bang. >> >> On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 5:51 PM Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Twin Paradox in General Relativity >>> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjHLboK2M1g >>> >>> From the perspective of the people in the world outside of the EMF event >>> horizon, the speed that things are happening on or inside that horizon is >>> ultra-fast. But at that horizon, the speed that things are happening is >>> occurring at a normal speed. >>> >>> This difference in the perspective of time is why we see no nuclear >>> activity going on at or inside the EMF horizon. These nuclear reactions >>> happen instantaneously from our perspective even if the radioactive isotope >>> takes billions of years to stabilize. >>> >>> On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 5:16 PM Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> There is no telling what elements will be transformed by the LENR >>>> reaction. When the LENR active agent get hold of palladium and deuterium, >>>> silver might be formed rather than just helium. The mesh should be examined >>>> in a SEM scan to see if there is some non palladium elements present on the >>>> nickel mesh. >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 5:03 PM JonesBeene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> *From: *Jürg Wyttenbach <ju...@datamart.ch> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> - In the Mizuno case we certainly will see 4-He with a 4-He a part >>>>> > that 106 of the 3-He part. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Jürg >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> If Mizuno is producing helium then it should show up very distinctly >>>>> when he looks for it- since the total gas inventory is so low and the >>>>> power >>>>> is so high that the ratio of He:D after along run will leave no doubt. As >>>>> of now – that evidence is lacking. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> It is too bad that we do not have more information now – as this >>>>> experiment is uniquely positioned to see it and if fount then it makes a >>>>> huge difference in what to expect from future devices. I’m on record as >>>>> predicting there will be none, well … only incidental Helium – possibly >>>>> unmeasurable. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Mizuno clearly states nickel is the host reactant – not the tiny >>>>> amount of palladium. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Where is the reliable evidence for helium being produced from >>>>> nickel/deuterium? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Jones >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>
