The polariton is a plasmonic based quasiparticle that loves to socialize. They are the quintessential party animal. If any polaritons are produced inside a LENR reactor, they will automatically find each other and begin an entangled get together.
This predisposition to produce a global condensate over the entire extent of the reactors surface structure is where all the EMF power comes from. This concentration of EMF power is known as super-radiance. super-radiance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superradiance <https://disq.us/url?url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FSuperradiance%3ArtAcI6hUs1ChEUPIMSpEt3sEdQM&cuid=2168707> In quantum optics, superradiance is a phenomenon that occurs when a group of N emitters, such as excited atoms, interact with a common light field. If the wavelength of the light is much greater than the separation of the emitters, then the emitters interact with the light in a collective and coherent fashion. This causes the group to emit light as a high intensity pulse (with rate ∝ N2). This is a surprising result, drastically different from the expected exponential decay (with rate ∝ N) of a group of independent atoms (see spontaneous emission). Superradiance has since been demonstrated in a wide variety of physical and chemical systems, such as quantum dot arrays and J-aggregates. The effect has recently been used to produce a superradiant laser. If we can pump EMF into a sub-straight such as a Mizuno micro mesh that are optimized to form plasmons and their bosonic progeny: polaritons, that sub-straight will sooner or later give rise to an EMF event horizon. A global polariton condensate will develop on the surface of the mesh that will generate a LENR active superradiant EMF event horizon. On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 7:10 PM Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > One of the reasons why superconductivity and LENR are so tightly connected > is that it would be near impossible to gather and then subsequently > maintain enough EMF power to produce an effective EMF event horizon. > Dispersion of optical power would soon destroy the meta-stable > concentration of EMF power upon which the LENR reaction depends. This is > where ultra-dense matter comes into the LENR picture. This state of matter > produces the state of superconductivity in the particles that make this > special type of matter. LENR takes to this special highly supportive > electromagnetic environment like bacteria take to a soup of supportive > nutrients in a petri dish. > > The LENR reaction can form in a non-superconductive situation, but it > needs far more input energy pumping to maintain the density of sufficient > polaritons that can sustain the associated development of an EMF event > horizon. This weaken gathering of polariton density is where gammas and > sundry nuclear reactive byproduct will manifest. > > > > On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 6:44 PM Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The production of gammas and radioactive isotopes is like the production >> of smoke in a weak fire that is just getting started. Once a fire gets >> going with a vengeance and the combustion process has firmly set in, the >> fire burns hottest with no smoke production. >> >> All the LENR old guard looked for the production of LENR smoke to prove >> to the outsiders that LENR was actually occurring. But once the LENR >> reaction set in strongly, there would be no LENR smoke to be had. The >> desire of the LENR old guard for the LENR reaction to prove its existence >> through the production of LENR smoke is counterproductive. >> >> On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 6:21 PM Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/21a1/9da6b2ac3da851177d2f4e93be88f73a330b.pdf >>> >>> Low Energy Nuclear Reactions resulting as picometer interactions with >>> similarity to K-shell electron capture >>> >>> H. Hora, G.H. Miley have come up with a theory that explains how >>> transmuted elements will form based on the quarks nature of matter. This is >>> applicable to what the mechanism of matter formation must have been when >>> elements first formed during the earliest times just after the big bang. >>> The way matter forms now inside the LENR reaction at the EMF event horizon >>> is the same as it had occurred just after the big bang. >>> >>> On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 5:51 PM Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Twin Paradox in General Relativity >>>> >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjHLboK2M1g >>>> >>>> From the perspective of the people in the world outside of the EMF >>>> event horizon, the speed that things are happening on or inside that >>>> horizon is ultra-fast. But at that horizon, the speed that things are >>>> happening is occurring at a normal speed. >>>> >>>> This difference in the perspective of time is why we see no nuclear >>>> activity going on at or inside the EMF horizon. These nuclear reactions >>>> happen instantaneously from our perspective even if the radioactive isotope >>>> takes billions of years to stabilize. >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 5:16 PM Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> There is no telling what elements will be transformed by the LENR >>>>> reaction. When the LENR active agent get hold of palladium and deuterium, >>>>> silver might be formed rather than just helium. The mesh should be >>>>> examined >>>>> in a SEM scan to see if there is some non palladium elements present on >>>>> the >>>>> nickel mesh. >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 5:03 PM JonesBeene <jone...@pacbell.net> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> *From: *Jürg Wyttenbach <ju...@datamart.ch> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> - In the Mizuno case we certainly will see 4-He with a 4-He a >>>>>> part > that 106 of the 3-He part. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Jürg >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> If Mizuno is producing helium then it should show up very distinctly >>>>>> when he looks for it- since the total gas inventory is so low and the >>>>>> power >>>>>> is so high that the ratio of He:D after along run will leave no doubt. As >>>>>> of now – that evidence is lacking. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> It is too bad that we do not have more information now – as this >>>>>> experiment is uniquely positioned to see it and if fount then it makes a >>>>>> huge difference in what to expect from future devices. I’m on record as >>>>>> predicting there will be none, well … only incidental Helium – possibly >>>>>> unmeasurable. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Mizuno clearly states nickel is the host reactant – not the tiny >>>>>> amount of palladium. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Where is the reliable evidence for helium being produced from >>>>>> nickel/deuterium? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Jones >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>
