OrionWorks wrote:
> Paul,
>
> ...whose email address is clearly displayed in all my vortex-l
> messages every-single-time as: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Try this logic --> By my choice I submit to Vortex-l. Dr. Mike has not submitted
his email to this list. People should not submit another persons email address
without permission. The lack of foresight, and dim consciousness found in nearly
every human being is rather frightening. It's no wonder an entire so-called
civilized country of so-called humans can support a war of killing. You people
can't get past your emotions, which passively dominate your consciousness. You
continue to kill each other, cycle after cycle, and time after time you find
what I refer to as fuzzy logic to justify your actions, referring to such wars
as defense or preemptive strike.
Please wake up!
> For someone who claims he is in pursuit of the "truth", that his
> motivations are driven by pure logic I find it incredibly
> contradictory for you to express the amount of LOLing that you do when
> you disagree with the opinions of others.
Indeed, because one needs to be light of heart to view such darkness within
humanity. I've discovered that people dominated by the passive emotional ego
become infuriated when they cannot strike emotions in another person who returns
their emotions with a so-called smirky smile. My study reveals that people
become more and more emotionally upset until they can at least spark some form
of emotions in the person. ... My LOL's really bother you, don't they. All I can
say is Sorry, but I'll continue being happy thank you very much.
It's my firm belief you people are utterly dominated by emotions, which the east
has rightfully identified and referred to as one's own self demons.
> It suggests on the surface a massive ego
I'll be more than happy to debate with you to see if you can prove your claims
that I am egotistical, but I already know your so-called logic has more holes
than Swiss cheese, and IMHO you believe (more like feel) you are correct because
you desire (an emotion) it to be so. Such a debate in all likelihood will bare
very little fruit, accomplish next to nothing while wasting a great deal of
time. After a lifetime of being correct nearly 100% of the time I can safely say
that my words (not my opinions) are based on truth and are justified. If you
only knew my actions, my history, and me then you would see how silly your words
are.
> that constantly needs to
> reassert its personal concept of superiority by dismissing the
> opinions of others - by all that LOLing you constantly express
> directly in their face. It comes across as one gigantic bluff tactic.
> Who are you trying to fool?
>
> IMO, you might come across more sincerely and with greater integrity
> and respect if you were to tone down the amount of posturing that you
> tend to indulge in, particularly when in disagreement with the
> opinions of others.
>
> By all means, feel free to disagree with the opinions of others. We
> all do. I certainly do.
>
> I certainly haven't agreed with how you have been going about
> expressing a lot of your opinions lately. I've kept those personal
> opinions to myself – until now.
You offer zero proof.
> PS: Your last concluding comment to Horace where you say:
>
>> BTW, let me know when you want continue our debate
>> on capturing ambient energy so I can educate (LOL)
>> you on some fundamental physics.
>
> ...reveals a very shallow, petty and manipulative attitude. Very
> arrogant. There is little room for the pursuit of "truth" or the
> pursuit of pure logic when one allows themselves to be consumed by
> such behaviors.
My "LOL" in "I can educate (LOL)" was between Horace and I. Horace gets it. It
appears you have no clue what the "LOL" truly meant in this case. My LOL was a
reflection of a sentence Horace has repeatedly posted recently.
Regards,
Paul Lowrance
