Michel, I understand you probably were not following the thread, but as Horace
even pointed out that Spammers subscribe to as many email lists as possible.
Therefore, when someone posts an email address then you're giving such spammers
that email.
Although knowing how polite and gentle Dr. Mike usually is, surely he would not
mind, but there's still no excuse. Horace is not perfect, but for him to argue
and argue about an obvious negative act is ...
This is pure and simple logic. For the umpteenth time, you people don't need to
post Dr. Mikes email and phone number when you can simply post Dr. Mikes web
URL. If Dr. Mike wishes to remove or even modify his email address and/or phone
number then support it. Don't hard code his email and phone number by emailing
it. Don't post it to potential spammers without first obtaining his permission.
Just in case that did not sink in with you people, post the URL rather than the
email address & phone number. If Dr. Mike changes his email and/or phone number
then it will reflect on his web page. Such a change will not reflect in your email.
Michel Jullian wrote:
Paul, the Vortex-L web archive automatically hides addresses given in the text
of messages, cf:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg20909.html
Further, as Horace correctly pointed out, the particular address [EMAIL
PROTECTED] you accused him of disseminating to this list's hypothetical
spammers has been publicized in an unhidden form on several web pages, see:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=eresrch%40eskimo.com&btnG=Google+Search
So kindly stop going on about this, you seem to fail to realize you're boring
us all to death.
Michel
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Lowrance"
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 5:56 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Banned from Steorn
OrionWorks wrote:
Paul,
...whose email address is clearly displayed in all my vortex-l
Try this logic --> By my choice I submit to Vortex-l. Dr. Mike has not submitted
his email to this list. People should not submit another persons email address
without permission. The lack of foresight, and dim consciousness found in nearly
every human being is rather frightening. It's no wonder an entire so-called
civilized country of so-called humans can support a war of killing. You people
can't get past your emotions, which passively dominate your consciousness. You
continue to kill each other, cycle after cycle, and time after time you find
what I refer to as fuzzy logic to justify your actions, referring to such wars
as defense or preemptive strike.
Please wake up!
For someone who claims he is in pursuit of the "truth", that his
motivations are driven by pure logic I find it incredibly
contradictory for you to express the amount of LOLing that you do when
you disagree with the opinions of others.
Indeed, because one needs to be light of heart to view such darkness within
humanity. I've discovered that people dominated by the passive emotional ego
become infuriated when they cannot strike emotions in another person who returns
their emotions with a so-called smirky smile. My study reveals that people
become more and more emotionally upset until they can at least spark some form
of emotions in the person. ... My LOL's really bother you, don't they. All I can
say is Sorry, but I'll continue being happy thank you very much.
It's my firm belief you people are utterly dominated by emotions, which the east
has rightfully identified and referred to as one's own self demons.
It suggests on the surface a massive ego
I'll be more than happy to debate with you to see if you can prove your claims
that I am egotistical, but I already know your so-called logic has more holes
than Swiss cheese, and IMHO you believe (more like feel) you are correct because
you desire (an emotion) it to be so. Such a debate in all likelihood will bare
very little fruit, accomplish next to nothing while wasting a great deal of
time. After a lifetime of being correct nearly 100% of the time I can safely say
that my words (not my opinions) are based on truth and are justified. If you
only knew my actions, my history, and me then you would see how silly your words
are.
that constantly needs to
reassert its personal concept of superiority by dismissing the
opinions of others - by all that LOLing you constantly express
directly in their face. It comes across as one gigantic bluff tactic.
Who are you trying to fool?
IMO, you might come across more sincerely and with greater integrity
and respect if you were to tone down the amount of posturing that you
tend to indulge in, particularly when in disagreement with the
opinions of others.
By all means, feel free to disagree with the opinions of others. We
all do. I certainly do.
I certainly haven't agreed with how you have been going about
expressing a lot of your opinions lately. I've kept those personal
opinions to myself – until now.
You offer zero proof.
PS: Your last concluding comment to Horace where you say:
BTW, let me know when you want continue our debate
on capturing ambient energy so I can educate (LOL)
you on some fundamental physics.
...reveals a very shallow, petty and manipulative attitude. Very
arrogant. There is little room for the pursuit of "truth" or the
pursuit of pure logic when one allows themselves to be consumed by
such behaviors.
My "LOL" in "I can educate (LOL)" was between Horace and I. Horace gets it. It
appears you have no clue what the "LOL" truly meant in this case. My LOL was a
reflection of a sentence Horace has repeatedly posted recently.
Regards,
Paul Lowrance
