Oh. :-) Terry <still dense>
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Jones Beene<[email protected]> wrote: > awkshulley that's not bad... and I would like to take credit for the > insight... Makes it more mysterious,at least, if not more accurate, than > the more mundane and dryly statistical intent: 'quantum mechanical fusion. ' > > ________________________________ > From: Terry Blanton <[email protected]> > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Jones Beene<[email protected]> wrote: > >> LENR could have been called QMF from the start, and it would have quieted >> some critics. > > Quantum modulation frequency? > > http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6TVM-4SMDYXB-3&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_searchStrId=993159205&_rerunOrigin=google&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=85782cf49cc5acb9c29b66765ce236f8 > > http://tinyurl.com/l4uh9q > > Terry <dense> > >
