At 11:03 AM 10/22/2009, Lawrence de Bivort wrote:
What do you think? Does this make sense? Do you want me to say more
about 'out-framing'? Or does the above give you an adequate sense
of what I am talking about?
I think I know what you mean. It would be a piece of writing that
systematically approaches the misconceptions that keep people from
taking a closer look at the evidence.
It would start by stating very clearly the reasons why cold fusion is
possible, establishing and showing a clear understanding of why it
would be properly rejected.
Then it would carefully, and step-by-step, dismantle this.
The trick, though, would be getting a dedicated skeptic to read it.
Perhaps you approach him and ask him for a favor, would he criticize
this? But you'd have to have the connection with him.
