When the hell did Steorn ever say they are open-sourcing it! Geez! They have investors and this is a commercial venture... "Evil capitalists!" Gimme a break...
FYI, the design of the unit is so simple, and replicators have been able to deduce most of the key elements of the device, including the number of turns on the coils (~37) from the videos!! From the measurements of inductance AND the measurements of magnet strength (0.47T) that WERE IN STEORN'S DEMO, replicators have determined the most likely core material (MetGlas?) and its characteristics, as well as other key things like POSITIONING of the coils being very precise, which is necessary to eliminate CEMF; and more that I don't have the time to spoon feed you... Go read the material on Overunity.com about the replication attempts... Don't underestimate them! They are quite a resourceful bunch and have figured much of it out... Mostly due to the FACT that Sean has made very specific statements in his demos, and has gone out of his way to answer technical questions on the Steorn Forum. Replicators have made very significant progress in as little as two to three WEEKS! That's more than I can say for any other claims of this kind. And no, the short time did not start in 2006, it started exactly when steorn said, which was the first Demo in December. And the schedule goes thru January. They set the schedule back then and have held to it; they have done exactly what they said they'd do. As explained in one of my previous posts, Sean made the call to do the public thing in 2007 and ended up with egg on his face; the other steorn engineers were not yet ready to demo it as they didn't have a good handle on what all was going on. So they spent the last two to three yrs doing experiments to understand enough of it where this time they are confident that things won't blow up in their face! Do you really think that they will risk global ridicule a second time??? No freakin way, and if I was one of the engineers, I sure as hell wouldn't hang around to risk that level of ridicule... -Mark -----Original Message----- From: William Beaty [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, January 16, 2010 7:41 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Vo]:Back EMF: Sean may be right On Sat, 16 Jan 2010, Mark Iverson wrote: > I don't believe any one here criticising Steorn and calling them > scammers has made an attempt to replicate their device... Correct me > if I'm wrong. What is the website link for complete Orbo details? > Just sit back and relax, and watch and read, and in a very short time > we'll see how well the device and explanations hold up to what they > are claiming... The "short time" began, what, in 2006? Why do you think it's going to be short? Seriously. When did Steorn say any such thing? Again, what is the website that gives Orbo details? Before anything else, I want to see what Steorn has to say about the toroid core material and the number of turns, source of neo magnets they used, etc. (((((((((((((((((( ( ( ( ( (O) ) ) ) ) ))))))))))))))))))) William J. Beaty SCIENCE HOBBYIST website billb amasci com http://amasci.com EE/programmer/sci-exhibits amateur science, hobby projects, sci fair Seattle, WA 206-762-3818 unusual phenomena, tesla coils, weird sci No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.725 / Virus Database: 270.14.142/2623 - Release Date: 01/15/10 23:35:00
