Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Does the evolved heat increase significantly? If so, that could be a win. Alternatively, shield an active cell heavily, to stop the cosmic ray muons, like do the experiment in a mine. I believe this has been done. Did the excess heat decline? On 02/05/2010 04:09 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: See: D. J. Nagel et al., "Diurnal Variations in LENR Experiments," ICCF-15 Book of Abstracts, p. 95. A Commentator wrote: Ah, c'mon, Jed. For those of us who don't have the abstracts handy, what's the punchline? Did it, or didn't it? -------------- Hi All, 2-6-10 This sort of thing (but not LENR) is discussed extensively on the Cycles list. Here are a few snippets. Jack Smith ------------- 1.1. Re: Space and time Posted by: "Gary Vezzoli" [email protected] Date: Sun Feb 8, 2009 The total solar eclipse is an element of cycles. So are the phases of the moon, and the annular solar eclipse. I explained this in detail at the beginning of the posts regarding the Jan 26 eclipse. The interruption of a neutrion flux by the moon is certainly cyclic, as is radiation decay patterns that are correlated with the distance to the Sun, the time of the solar day, the lunar month, and the sidereal year. Gary C. V.Dr.Gary Christopher Vezzoli, Physicist ------------- 1a. Re: Gravitational shadows Posted by: "l_vuyk" [email protected] l_vuyk Date: Thu Jun 25, 2009 Perhaps the next eclipse prediction for 22 july 2009 based on new "double LeSage gravity" is of interest. See: Double LeSage gravity solutions for the Solar Eclipse Gravity anomalies found by Wang and Yang/ Mishra and Rao. http://migratingblackholes.blogspot.com/2009/03/blog-post.html -------------- To: [email protected] Posted by: [email protected] Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 Subject: [cyclesi] Comments on "The Pioneer Anomaly in the Light of New Data" Comments on "The Pioneer Anomaly in the Light of New Data" Authors: John C. Hodge (Submitted on 2 Jul 2009) Abstract: Turyshev, S.G., Toth, V.T., 2009. (preprint arXiv:0906.0399) reported on the status of the analysis of recently recovered Pioneer 10 (P10) and Pioneer 11 (P11) flight data and commented on some, but not all, of the characteristics of the Pioneer Anomaly (PA) that must be explained by a candidate model. Only one model presented to date is consistent with all the characteristics. http://arxiv.org/abs/0907.0425 Variations of the anomolous acceleration with siderial year and day are also suggested as being present. These cycles are consistent with the periods found by Shnoll etc in fluctuations of many physical, chemical and biological measurements ... Regards, Ray
