________________________________
From: /o=LMCO/ou=Site04/cn=Recipients/cn=RDB149218
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 3:33 PM
To: 'Jones Beene'
Cc: '[email protected]'
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Doing the Bosenova

Finding your tracks ('Fire from Ice' the 
prequel<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg13268.html>) on 
Vortex while searching out the 2 kinds of relativistic hydrogen -actual 
velocity from the suns corona vs the "equivalent" relativistic Hydrogen inside 
a cavity -was reading a paper on the relativistic Bohr 
model<http://www.iop.org/EJ/article/0143-0807/29/4/008/ejp8_4_008.pdf?request-id=b10032bb-a24f-479c-bbee-ed5085a080c5>
 which agrees with Mills non radiative translation. There is a big surprise 
here that I am trying to flesh out -accelerating matter on the spatial axis to 
near C requires a lot of energy - you need .707 C just to reach 45 degrees 
between space and time from our perspective. You can attain equivalent 
acceleration by parking in a high G field.  In both these cases we are plugging 
the holes to the sink either by incurring more interaction via acceleration for 
a given mass or equivalently adding more mass to accumulate pressure. In the 
case for Casimir cavity we have the opposite situation, vacuum energy is 
reduced. The cavity relieves pressure accumulated by the plates in a tiny 
permanent concentrated stream. Instead of matter moving at.707 C relative to 
the time axis we have stationary matter inside the cavity with the time axis 
executing at many times the normal rate relative to the spatial axis.
Regards

Fran




Reply via email to