Jones Beene said on Mon, 01 Feb 2010 08:23:13 -0800
[snip]
“The main "leap of faith" is that a process which is proved to happen in very
cold conditions, can happen less frequently in a temporal or QM situation -
since "coldness" can be mimicked by other restraints - including time
dilation, internal pressurization, magnetic alignment and "overvoltage".”
[/snip]
Lets not forget spatial confinement and vacuum suppression both of which are
present in lattices, skeletal catalysts and Casimir cavities. I include the
lattice even though it is nearly isotropic because IMHO it accumulates the
“pressure” that rapidly streams out very small cavities and defect apertures
creating permanent fields because the geometry is not large enough to “sink”
the accumulation.
I have been investigating LET recently and think your source and sink are the
positive and negative excursions of Lorentz’s Y axis that he calls “stationary
ether”. The same thing that the Puthoff atomic model claims keeps orbitals
sustained and the same thing Tesla claims that all matter eats. I think virtual
particles fill this medium and have a relative “temporal displacement” to our
spatial axis that provides our reference of time flow. This reference is
modified inside Casimir cavities and catalysts providing reactants with
equivalent “displacement” on the time axis while remaining spatially almost
stationary from our perspective. The V^2/C^2 relationship defines the Y axis =
C = whatever the rate of virtual particles through the spatial axis happens to
be. No matter what the rate it will always appear to be C to us drawn on the
present layer of the X axis for the same reason a 2d stick figure is unaware of
volume.
Best Regards
Fran
