Stephen, No you didn't miss anything. I think the issues you raise are being discussed in the thread: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8892.0 I don't think he is behaving like Stiffler.
He is aware that he still has not provided unambiguous evidence of OU. In the thread he claims he ran it without the meters got the same effect. Harry ----- Original Message ---- > From: Stephen A. Lawrence <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Thu, March 18, 2010 9:25:35 AM > Subject: Re: [Vo]:add on: OU demonstrated ( with no secrets) > > On 03/18/2010 12:45 AM, Harry Veeder wrote: > ----- Original > Message ---- >> From: Stephen A. Lawrence < > ymailto="mailto:[email protected]"; > href="mailto:[email protected]";>[email protected]> >> To: > ymailto="mailto:[email protected]"; > href="mailto:[email protected]";>[email protected] >> Sent: Wed, > March 17, 2010 2:58:11 PM >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:add on: OU demonstrated > ( with no secrets) > >> Even with the battery hooked up, it > would be so easy for the guy >> to measure current drain from the > battery, and measure current into >> the caps, multiply by the input > and output voltage values, and >> compare the power in and power out -- > but he didn't do that; >> obviously he doesn't want to find out what's > really going on. > > He does this near the end of test 6: > > > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UflGpzijWIA > > and asks for an > explanation how 3 volts peak to peak or 562mV rms > can charge the > capacitor to 17 volts. Does what -- makes simultaneous voltage and > current measurements and determines power output of the battery(s), and the > signal generator, and power input to the capacitors, and compares them? > I watched a good bit of the video, and skipped around looking for that (it's > a bit long IMHO), but I didn't see anything like it. I saw him > measuring voltages and I heard him refer to the voltage as being "energy" > (which it's not) but I didn't hear anything about amps, watts, or actual > power drain. Did I miss the power measurement? Did he actually do > it somewhere? I don't think he did, but if he did, what did he > find? How did input and output **power** compare? As to his > question -- how could such a low input voltage (which he called 'energy', as > I recall) produce such a high output voltage -- it's disingenuous. He's > got a transformer there, duh. And as to the input -- he's using a heavy > duty signal generator in this video, if my eyes do not deceive me. Turn > it around, you'll probably find the back is covered with heat sinks. > That's a very serious power supply there, and again, he hasn't measured the > *current* it's putting out, so he has no idea how much power is being > injected into his circuit. Without knowing input power, the rest is just > hot air. As I already observed, it's just like running a CF experiment, > and claiming excess heat, but never using a calorimeter, and never measuring > input electrical power. > > note: he simplified > the input circuitry from test 4. > > > Harry > > > > > __________________________________________________________________ > The > new Internet Explorer® 8 - Faster, safer, easier. Optimized for > Yahoo! Get it Now for Free! at > href="http://downloads.yahoo.com/ca/internetexplorer/"; target=_blank > >http://downloads.yahoo.com/ca/internetexplorer/ > > __________________________________________________________________ Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr! http://www.flickr.com/gift/
