Follows:> The least you could do is provide a reference, preferably on a 
Russian official public website to this public darkenergy claim of yours.


OK:  I originally got this from Russian-web circulation some time back having 
it read to me from Russian to English by a Russian friend of mine:  for now 
this is an oblique reference--> http://www.russia-ic.com/news/show/7588/ 
<------& The following quote:---> Don Roper a law professor at CO was quoted 
saying:

 

"Romanian sources have alleged that the 'Ellipton' weapon referred to by 
Russian politician VladimirZhirinovsky is a weapon system based on 
gravitational interference.  The source hinted at a link between the use of 
this type of weapon and the cause of the Armenian earthquake.  The 'Hamme,' as 
the weapon is also known, can allegedly trigger earthquakes through varying the 
gravitational acceleration in areas where there is accumulated tension in the 
ground."

 

And here is the relevant statement from Vladimir Zhirinovsky, who 
declared:-->Quote: "This weapon is stronger than nuclear weapons because its 
consequences are different, and there is no antidote.  This is where its 
strength lies.  There is no way of defending against it.  It is the same with 
the sonic weapon.  We also have this.  What happens is that the cartridge 
detonates, and sound is such that it brings down and entire military division.  
That is it; they are dead. . . . .  the Elipton has the same effect.  There is 
no radiation, no fire.  There are no wounds.  And an entire military division 
simply dies.  It is similar to the neutron weapon, but the latter has 
radiation.  It has a damaging effect.  The neutrons enter the human body; those 
cause the destruction.  With the former, there is no damage, but all of life is 
immediately destroyed.  Asked if the Americansor others had the weapon(then in 
the 1990's):  No... No one.  Russian scientists developed it 
exclusively."<---End quote.

 

Me/Jack:  A focused Electro-Grav Torus 'transmitted' device would work as well 
in the ground-strata as it would as it functions in the Norway-Spiral  
air-transmitted/frisbeed 'hyper-gravity-wake' mode.  If such a hyper-grav-torus 
passed through flesh & blood as a surface transmitted weapon it would likely as 
Zhirinovsky stated indeed damage/stress organic tissue fatally.  This is just a 
high-Density-Torsion/Torus seriously mega-amplified version of fairly well 
known hi-density EM-pulse anti-electronics weapons and seriously NOT that hard 
to wrap your brain around.

 

by the way:  ?Am I speaking with contracted 
Govt.-debunkers/hecklers/discreditors/here.  If so:  ?Will you tell us who you 
are really working for; and how much they pay you to monitor vortex-l?  I was 
invited by our Govt. to consult a back-engineering effort to play catch-up to 
the Russians who by their best intel was completely convinced was REAL 
TECHNOLOGY.  It was and we have since surpassed them.  And if you compare this 
to Bush's bogus-WMD intel on Sadam; I'll call you for the Govt. disinformation 
schill/employee/stooge that you indeed are.

 

 

PS. The West's Cold War blush of victory VANISHED when Zhirinovsky made those 
statements.  So if you think that paranoid Russia's extended technology did not 
in fact produce a la' Tesla/Podkletnov the Norway Spiral Hyper-Grav-Wake 
electro-plasmic-Torus/Torsion  Missle interdiction weapon; then you are 
seriously deluded; if not a Govt. disinformation shill altogether.  Cheers;  
Jack Harbach O'Sullivan

 


 
> CC: [email protected]
> From: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:~Norway proof of concept/Man-made Man-played~
> Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 08:05:08 +0300
> To: [email protected]
> 
> The least you could do is provide a reference, preferably on a Russian 
> official public website to this public darkenergy claim of yours.
> 
> iPoni sent dis message. Esa Ruoho wrote it. 
> 
> On 24.9.2010, at 0.34, "Jack Harbach-O'Sullivan" <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> > FACT? * * * ! MOSCOW has publically announced that they have PROVEN 
> > DARK-ENERGY ! * * *NORWAY-SPIRAL?
> 
                                          

Reply via email to