-----Original Message-----
From: Terry Blanton 

> But the much m(is)aligned Norway Spiral had nothing to do with
Gennady's Torsion Physics.  It had a lot to do with Newton's Torsion
Physics:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zx8i5EfmYU4


Yes. It is too easy to build a house of cards out of an event with a mundane
explanation ... however, this does not mean that a few of the coincidences
which we read about on these "deep BS sites", particularly Hoagland, cannot
point to something else with a real grain of truth. This is basically
entertainment folks, not science ... in the same way that Rush Bimbo is
entertainment, not politics. However, like the blind hogs that they are,
even entertainers masquerading as scientists can, on occasion, find an
acorn.

Having said that, it is most curious that Hoagland does not fully pursue the
thread that includes Haiti, the big quake, and Chavez's accusation that the
US was somehow involved (since he was tipped by the Ruskies). I say curious,
because on the same page is the so-called "Texas New Mexico Ring" ... and he
overlooks somehow that it positioned directly over Midland Texas.

All you need know from there on, is to note that one of Midland's largest
employers is Dawson Geophysical, a company with mysterious connections to
both spooks and Big Oil.

http://www.dawson3d.com/acquisition/technologies.html

... which makes it a dangerous and well-connected company that, as Chavez
was probably aware, was hunting for petroleum deposits near Haiti, and
probably "could have" triggered the quake with something they were doing ...

... such that the larger connection is this - if indeed the ring over
Midland turns out to be further evidence that one their techniques for
locating petroleum involves torsion physics, which it probably does, and the
Russians know this too, then we have another "conspiracy in the making", no?

Please, Hoagland, do NOT quote this commentator or this forum, when you
build your next "mountain out of a mole-hill". At worst, Dawson could have
accelerated by a few weeks or months a quake that was going to happen
anyway, and they had no way of knowing where or when, nor the level of
destruction which might follow.

Which is not to say that "someone" did not take notice of the incident in
its entirety, and that someone might have a way of knowing where or when
"beneficial" tragedies can be triggered.

In retrospect the smoking gun evidence is usually that Goldman Sucks was
involved somehow in a futures-bet against impossible odds that the disaster
would happen when it does happen ...

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/06/month-oil-spill-goldman-sachs-sold-250-mi
llion-bp-stock/

Jones


Reply via email to