Re: Newton's Torsion Physics: I am inclined to concur:->~JHO~
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [Vo]:~Norway proof of concept/Man-made Man-played~
> Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 10:54:09 -0700
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Terry Blanton
>
> > But the much m(is)aligned Norway Spiral had nothing to do with
> Gennady's Torsion Physics. It had a lot to do with Newton's Torsion
> Physics:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zx8i5EfmYU4
>
>
> Yes. It is too easy to build a house of cards out of an event with a mundane
> explanation ... however, this does not mean that a few of the coincidences
> which we read about on these "deep BS sites", particularly Hoagland, cannot
> point to something else with a real grain of truth. This is basically
> entertainment folks, not science ... in the same way that Rush Bimbo is
> entertainment, not politics. However, like the blind hogs that they are,
> even entertainers masquerading as scientists can, on occasion, find an
> acorn.
>
> Having said that, it is most curious that Hoagland does not fully pursue the
> thread that includes Haiti, the big quake, and Chavez's accusation that the
> US was somehow involved (since he was tipped by the Ruskies). I say curious,
> because on the same page is the so-called "Texas New Mexico Ring" ... and he
> overlooks somehow that it positioned directly over Midland Texas.
>
> All you need know from there on, is to note that one of Midland's largest
> employers is Dawson Geophysical, a company with mysterious connections to
> both spooks and Big Oil.
>
> http://www.dawson3d.com/acquisition/technologies.html
>
> ... which makes it a dangerous and well-connected company that, as Chavez
> was probably aware, was hunting for petroleum deposits near Haiti, and
> probably "could have" triggered the quake with something they were doing ...
>
> ... such that the larger connection is this - if indeed the ring over
> Midland turns out to be further evidence that one their techniques for
> locating petroleum involves torsion physics, which it probably does, and the
> Russians know this too, then we have another "conspiracy in the making", no?
>
> Please, Hoagland, do NOT quote this commentator or this forum, when you
> build your next "mountain out of a mole-hill". At worst, Dawson could have
> accelerated by a few weeks or months a quake that was going to happen
> anyway, and they had no way of knowing where or when, nor the level of
> destruction which might follow.
>
> Which is not to say that "someone" did not take notice of the incident in
> its entirety, and that someone might have a way of knowing where or when
> "beneficial" tragedies can be triggered.
>
> In retrospect the smoking gun evidence is usually that Goldman Sucks was
> involved somehow in a futures-bet against impossible odds that the disaster
> would happen when it does happen ...
>
> http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/06/month-oil-spill-goldman-sachs-sold-250-mi
> llion-bp-stock/
>
> Jones
>
>
