On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:

> This amplification of input is why he has named it the way he has.

Although, it would not really be amplification, would it?  The
reaction has a known instability and he uses the 400 W stable source
to mask that instability.

Real time measurements of the core would tell the truth.

T

Reply via email to