Robin, I don't understand- excuse where is the pressure of hydrogen measured? It is adsorbed absorbed in the nanometric nickel, the temperature increases there up to say 400 C- I don't think the reactor has a manometer on it. Peter
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Horace Heffner <hheff...@mtaonline.net>wrote: > > On Feb 23, 2011, at 5:47 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: > > In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:35:03 -0900: >> Hi, >> [snip] >> >>> This 270kWh per 0.4 g if hydrogen is obviously well beyond chemical >>> if the consumables actually are H and Ni. The energy E per H is: >>> >>> E = (270kwh) /(0.4 g * Na / (1.00797 gm/mol)) = 2.54x10^4 eV / H >>> >>> E = 25.4 keV per atom of H. >>> >>> This is about 2.5 times the ionization energy of the innermost >>> electron of Ni. This is well under expected conventional weak >>> reaction energies feasible between protons and Ni, but not out of >>> the range of feasibility for hydrino reactions, or deflation fusion >>> reactions. >>> >> >> ..we also don't know how much of the H remained in the Ni after the >> reaction was >> finished. >> > > Yes, very true. The 25.4 keV is a *minimum* energy per hydrogen atom. > However, if 30% of the Ni was converted to Cu, or even if readily > observable quantities of new elements were created, then we have to expect > much or even most of the hydrogen was consumed. > > Something doesn't add up here. There should have been a very observable > drop in hydrogen pressure, because the hydrogen was shut off after initial > loading. > > > > >> Regards, >> >> Robin van Spaandonk >> >> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html >> > > Best regards, > > Horace Heffner > http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/ > > > > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
