On Feb 24, 2011, at 12:19 PM, [email protected] wrote:
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Thu, 24 Feb 2011 11:39:36
-0900:
Hi,
[snip]
..we also don't know how much of the H remained in the Ni after the
reaction was
finished.
Yes, very true. The 25.4 keV is a *minimum* energy per hydrogen
atom. However, if 30% of the Ni was converted to Cu, or even if
readily observable quantities of new elements were created, then we
have to expect much or even most of the hydrogen was consumed.
Something doesn't add up here. There should have been a very
observable drop in hydrogen pressure, because the hydrogen was shut
off after initial loading.
Two different experiments. The Copper conversion is a report from
Rossi about an
earlier run. We don't what if anything was created/transmuted in
the run where
0.4 gm H2 was consumed, so there isn't necessarily a conflict.
Yes, right. I keep blurring or confusing the lies between the
various tests and the patent itself. I don't even know if the Ni
container was sealed. And, as Peter pointed out, there was no
pressure gage used:
On Feb 24, 2011, at 11:48 AM, Peter Gluck wrote:
Robin,
I don't understand- excuse where is the pressure of hydrogen
measured? It is adsorbed absorbed in the nanometric nickel, the
temperature increases there up to say 400 C- I don't think the
reactor has a manometer on it.
Peter
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
