In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Thu, 24 Feb 2011 11:39:36 -0900: Hi, [snip] >> ..we also don't know how much of the H remained in the Ni after the >> reaction was >> finished. > >Yes, very true. The 25.4 keV is a *minimum* energy per hydrogen >atom. However, if 30% of the Ni was converted to Cu, or even if >readily observable quantities of new elements were created, then we >have to expect much or even most of the hydrogen was consumed. > >Something doesn't add up here. There should have been a very >observable drop in hydrogen pressure, because the hydrogen was shut >off after initial loading.
Two different experiments. The Copper conversion is a report from Rossi about an earlier run. We don't what if anything was created/transmuted in the run where 0.4 gm H2 was consumed, so there isn't necessarily a conflict. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html
