Jones,
I love your brain storming ability par excellance. I have found it
inspiring on numerous occasions.
Personally, I don't think gravity has anything to do with cold
fusion. I am sure Frank Znidarsic, if would disagree. Perhaps, if he
is listening, will chime in to the discussion.
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
On Mar 1, 2011, at 7:35 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
Horace's mention of gravity wrt partial unification of forces,
raise a side-issue worth consideration in regard to dense 2D
hydrogen clusters, and possibly the Rossi device.
One wonders if there can be a non-nuclear heat anomaly which shows
up merely from "densification" alone, with a tiny expected increase
in local gravity dynamics or gravimagnetics. This might be also be
a M.O. which requires a critical mass to proceed. Another
possibility is that mirror matter somehow comes into play under
extreme density conditions.
Any hypothesis should have no relationship to matter of normal
density – which is conservative up to and above osmium (the densest
recognized element). However, "pycno" (or the hydrino) or IRH could
be orders of magnitude denser, if Miley and Holmlid are to be
believed. AFAIK, Mills has not addressed the density question.
Does extreme density open up a back door for overunity, even
without nuclear reactions? – such as if pycno would naturally
penetrate slightly further into inner orbitals of host dielectrics,
due to its increased attraction to a heavy nucleus (still tiny but
possibly more significant) - then eventually there is ejection at
increased velocity, raising the net kinetic energy level. This
would be a new kind of chemistry, since it is dominated by electron
orbital effects, without direct nuclear alteration (nuclear
reactions could still be secondary to the main anomaly).
This would be related to “inner orbital chemistry,” aka
“suprachemisty” and it has been alluded to before - as opposed to
valence electron chemistry. Conservation of energy may apply only
to the later.
Wiki has a related entry under "ballotechnics". Again, this does
not attempt to explain "where" the anomalous energy associated with
it comes from, but only how it gets here.
Jones
