-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] > Ah..in short you reject the Hydrino hypothesis outright, since below ground state orbitals are the very core of his theory.
No, not exactly. For me there has to be an extremely strong connection between what he is seeing and the dense hydrogen as described by others, including what is active in the Rossi device. I think it is physically impossible that Ni-H gain can be derived in too different ways. Ni-H can be radically different from Pd-D, but not two ways to get excess from the same reactants. Mills has demonstrated gain, but has not demonstrated that the excess energy he sees comes from the 'shrinkage' - and it could more easily be coming from the immediate expansion of an endothermic hydrino, in which case it is ZPE related and not very different from what others, who are associated with LENR are seeing. There is secondary radioactivity as a by-product. Mills has never produced good evidence that the hydrino is stable. AFAIK, it is simply another way of describing spillover hydrogen which has densified in two dimensions. Jones
