Horace Heffner <[email protected]> wrote:
> I can't easily read the document, but the fact professional techniques > exist is irrelevant. When and where were these techniques applied to > Rossi's experiments? > On Feb. 10, during the 18-hour test. See: http://lenr-canr.org/News.htm I cannot imagine what you have in mind when you say that Levi's use of industry standard professional techniques is "irrelevant." What is that suppose to mean?!? A standard technique that described by regulations is obviously best. It is most convincing. There is no need to come up with a novel technique when we have one that all professionals already use. > Well, aren't you snide today? > Chalk it up to the Randi in Boise effect: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Randy_in_Boise You will get a similar response if you go around telling HVAC engineers that their techniques are "amateur" "shabby" and a "Barnum and Bailey act." They will tell you what I told you, only with stronger language and less patience. - Jed
