Horace Heffner <[email protected]> wrote:
> http://lenr-canr.org/News.htm >> > > > I don't see where the calorimetry is documented there. I don't see where an > overall energy balance was taken. Also, it was only a 6 hour test - pretty > useless for due diligence. You are looking in the wrong place. Scroll down to "Rossi 18-hour demonstration." The calorimetry is documented in as much detail as you find in any HVAC inspection sheet: Duration of test: 18 hours Flow rate: 3,000 L/h = ~833 ml/s. Cooling water input temperature: 15°C Cooling water output temperature: ~20°C Input power from control electronics: variable, average 80 W, closer to 20 W for 6 hours . . . > The issue is not what technique is best, but the credibility of the > whatever technique was supplied. What was supplied in the demos I read > about . . . Keep reading. > . . .were a joke. Then you will find boiler maintenance regulations a laff riot. I do not think you understand this subject well enough to judge what is a joke. - Jed
