Dear Angela,
If you read the patent WO 2010/058288 (co-inventor is Piantelli's daughter,
a physicist) and compare it with Rossi's patent you will see why the later
has problems.
Piantelli's patent has logical coherence- you can understand WHY you have to
do what it describes.
Peter

On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Angela Kemmler <[email protected]>wrote:

> > Hello Everyone,
> >
> > There is probably a simple explanation for this.
> >
> > In the new video that can be found on the following site.
> >
> > http://www.rainews24.rai.it/it/canale-tv.php?id=23074
> >
> > A schematic layout of the experiment is shown
> >
> > In the schematic there is a canister of hydrogen labeled H2
> >
> > There is another canister beside it labeled D2
> >
> > What is this canister?
> >
> > Is it just a second canister of hydrogen?
>
>
> The schematic is not from Rossis patent (he owns no so far). Its from a
> patent from Francesco Piantelli, who got a patent about H-Ni fusion in 1995
> and a second in 2010. I understand italian quite well. In the rainews-video
> they interview the patent-lawyer of Piantelli, who says that Rossi will
> never get the patent because Piantelli invented it earlier.
> --
> Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir
> belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de
>
>


-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Reply via email to