So to be clear, do you think that Rossi's statement that a catalyst (two elements other than nickel) is used in the E-Cat is a lie?
________________________________ From: Peter Gluck <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wed, May 4, 2011 5:33:00 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:What is the D2 Canister next to the H2 Canister Thanks! I do not think that a secret catalyst exists- it is about a better nanostructure of nichel made by physical or chemical (?) methods. It can be an alloy or a mixture but nanotechnology is the key. I told that the catalyst is actually NiEnTe, nichts, nada etc but people enjoy speculating.Vederemo! I can sincerely and technically appreciate the difficulties Rossi had in differentiating from Piantelli old patent. Peter On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Angela Kemmler <[email protected]> wrote: >-------- Original-Nachricht -------- >> Datum: Wed, 4 May 2011 13:48:37 +0300 >> Von: Peter Gluck <[email protected]> >> An: [email protected] >> Betreff: Re: [Vo]:What is the D2 Canister next to the H2 Canister > > >> Dear Angela, >> If you read the patent WO 2010/058288 (co-inventor is Piantelli's >> daughter, >> a physicist) and compare it with Rossi's patent you will see why the later >> has problems. >> Piantelli's patent has logical coherence- you can understand WHY you have >> to >> do what it describes. >> Peter > > >Yes Peter I read the patent about 2 month ago. The difference is that he has >no >secret catalyst. A patent must describe all the details an expert needs to >replicate an effect and it must explain the "best method" available at the >moment the patent request is made. I don't remember the details of the two >Pantelli patents however. Was that your question? Regards, Angela >-- > >Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir >belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
