Thanks! I do not think that a secret catalyst exists- it is about a better nanostructure of nichel made by physical or chemical (?) methods. It can be an alloy or a mixture but nanotechnology is the key. I told that the catalyst is actually NiEnTe, nichts, nada etc but people enjoy speculating.Vederemo! I can sincerely and technically appreciate the difficulties Rossi had in differentiating from Piantelli old patent. Peter
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Angela Kemmler <[email protected]>wrote: > > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > > Datum: Wed, 4 May 2011 13:48:37 +0300 > > Von: Peter Gluck <[email protected]> > > An: [email protected] > > Betreff: Re: [Vo]:What is the D2 Canister next to the H2 Canister > > > Dear Angela, > > If you read the patent WO 2010/058288 (co-inventor is Piantelli's > > daughter, > > a physicist) and compare it with Rossi's patent you will see why the > later > > has problems. > > Piantelli's patent has logical coherence- you can understand WHY you have > > to > > do what it describes. > > Peter > > > Yes Peter I read the patent about 2 month ago. The difference is that he > has no secret catalyst. A patent must describe all the details an expert > needs to replicate an effect and it must explain the "best method" available > at the moment the patent request is made. I don't remember the details of > the two Pantelli patents however. Was that your question? Regards, Angela > -- > Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir > belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
