It is no place for philosophy here but it is a problem of definition- things re not 11000% true or 100% lies. If it is a catalyzer- what does it catalyze? (accelerate a reaction and is not consumed?)
Catalyzers work via active sites (see my ancient paper http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/GluckPunderstand.pdf <http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/GluckPunderstand.pdf>(active sites were later enobled to NAE) more more active sites per unit of volume or of weight= better catalyst, more intense reaction. Rossi's merit - is, I think a superior Ni nanostructure, with higher activity. An example- Rosii says there are 100 grams of NI in the core -true! He says there is 1 gram ni there- also true, because only a small fraction of Ni actually works. But E-cat is a good catchword and inspires speculation. Peter On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 3:59 PM, noone noone <[email protected]>wrote: > So to be clear, do you think that Rossi's statement that a catalyst (two > elements other than nickel) is used in the E-Cat is a lie? > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Peter Gluck <[email protected]> > *To:* [email protected] > *Sent:* Wed, May 4, 2011 5:33:00 AM > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:What is the D2 Canister next to the H2 Canister > > Thanks! I do not think that a secret catalyst exists- it is about a better > nanostructure of nichel made by physical or > chemical (?) methods. It can be an alloy or a mixture but nanotechnology is > the key. > I told that the catalyst is actually NiEnTe, nichts, nada etc but people > enjoy speculating.Vederemo! > I can sincerely and technically appreciate the difficulties Rossi had in > differentiating from Piantelli old patent. > Peter > > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Angela Kemmler <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> -------- Original-Nachricht -------- >> > Datum: Wed, 4 May 2011 13:48:37 +0300 >> > Von: Peter Gluck <[email protected]> >> > An: [email protected] >> > Betreff: Re: [Vo]:What is the D2 Canister next to the H2 Canister >> >> > Dear Angela, >> > If you read the patent WO 2010/058288 (co-inventor is Piantelli's >> > daughter, >> > a physicist) and compare it with Rossi's patent you will see why the >> later >> > has problems. >> > Piantelli's patent has logical coherence- you can understand WHY you >> have >> > to >> > do what it describes. >> > Peter >> >> >> Yes Peter I read the patent about 2 month ago. The difference is that he >> has no secret catalyst. A patent must describe all the details an expert >> needs to replicate an effect and it must explain the "best method" available >> at the moment the patent request is made. I don't remember the details of >> the two Pantelli patents however. Was that your question? Regards, Angela >> -- >> Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir >> belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de >> >> > > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
