Rossi has specifically stated that the catalysts are elements that are not nickel.
If there are not other elements in there then he has lied. If that is a case he is a sorry scumbag monster and I hope his technology goes no where. However, I think he is telling the truth. ________________________________ From: Peter Gluck <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wed, May 4, 2011 6:26:00 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:What is the D2 Canister next to the H2 Canister It is no place for philosophy here but it is a problem of definition- things re not 11000% true or 100% lies. If it is a catalyzer- what does it catalyze? (accelerate a reaction and is not consumed?) Catalyzers work via active sites (see my ancient paper http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/GluckPunderstand.pdf (active sites were later enobled to NAE) more more active sites per unit of volume or of weight= better catalyst, more intense reaction. Rossi's merit - is, I think a superior Ni nanostructure, with higher activity. An example- Rosii says there are 100 grams of NI in the core -true! He says there is 1 gram ni there- also true, because only a small fraction of Ni actually works. But E-cat is a good catchword and inspires speculation. Peter On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 3:59 PM, noone noone <[email protected]> wrote: So to be clear, do you think that Rossi's statement that a catalyst (two elements other than nickel) is used in the E-Cat is a lie? > > > > > ________________________________ From: Peter Gluck <[email protected]> >To: [email protected] >Sent: Wed, May 4, 2011 5:33:00 AM >Subject: Re: [Vo]:What is the D2 Canister next to the H2 Canister > > >Thanks! I do not think that a secret catalyst exists- it is about a better >nanostructure of nichel made by physical or >chemical (?) methods. It can be an alloy or a mixture but nanotechnology is >the >key. > I told that the catalyst is actually NiEnTe, nichts, nada etc but people > enjoy >speculating.Vederemo! >I can sincerely and technically appreciate the difficulties Rossi had in >differentiating from Piantelli old patent. >Peter > > >On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Angela Kemmler <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>-------- Original-Nachricht -------- >>> Datum: Wed, 4 May 2011 13:48:37 +0300 >>> Von: Peter Gluck <[email protected]> >>> An: [email protected] >>> Betreff: Re: [Vo]:What is the D2 Canister next to the H2 Canister >> >> >>> Dear Angela, >>> If you read the patent WO 2010/058288 (co-inventor is Piantelli's >>> daughter, >>> a physicist) and compare it with Rossi's patent you will see why the later >>> has problems. >>> Piantelli's patent has logical coherence- you can understand WHY you have >>> to >>> do what it describes. >>> Peter >> >> >>Yes Peter I read the patent about 2 month ago. The difference is that he has >>no >>secret catalyst. A patent must describe all the details an expert needs to >>replicate an effect and it must explain the "best method" available at the >>moment the patent request is made. I don't remember the details of the two >>Pantelli patents however. Was that your question? Regards, Angela >>-- >> >>Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir >>belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de >> >> > > >-- >Dr. Peter Gluck >Cluj, Romania >http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
