Peter Ekstrom's analysis:
“the E-Cat does not produce excess Energy”.

Rossi  responds to Peter Ekstrom's analysis:

Andrea Rossi 
June 28th, 2011 at 5:24 PM 
Dear Michael Cox:
The “analysis” of Peter Ekstrom is wrong, based on wrong data. Days ago a clown 
made a similar “analysis” calculating difficult data from the television. I 
thought that this kind of thing were made only by clowns. Now I see that there 
are physics that do the same. I answered to the clown that I was impressed from 
his ability. To a physic I answer that I am very much impressed.
The “movie professor” has forgot that the steam condensates, that when 
condensates it turns into very hot water and the heat lost goes to the surface 
of the pipe, heating it,therefore :
1- the pipe gets very hot (80-90 °C) radiating up to 1 Wh/h (thermal) per 
square cm across a surface of thousands of square cm (5400 in this case). This 
heat has to be calculated. If not we forget that when we keep warm our house 
during the winter, radiators heat up at expense of the circulating hot water. 
5400 sq. cm x 1 wh/h makes up to 5.4 thermal kW that can go that way.
2- the hot water burns, so I emptied the condensed water from the pipe to avoid 
that a jet of hot water could burn my face (as once, unfortunately, happened): 
why did I make this? Because I am not masochist. And: shaking the pipe I made 
it free from the morse of the mouth of the sink.
3- the temperature of the fluid inside the vertical chimney was more than 100.1 
°C, and the pressure measured was room pressure. Should the water have been 
liquid, at room pressure the temperature in a vertical chimney would have been 
99 °C, because, for the gravity, the chimney would have been filled up by 
water, and water at 100.1 °C, at room P, cannot be liquid.
I have not the time to correct the many other mistakes of our 
“movie-professor”, because I worked 16 hours, time is 2 a.m. and I must go to 
sleep, tomorrow other 16 hours of work: no more time for “movie-professors”
Besides, clowneries apart, I answer with my plants. In October we will start up 
our first plant of 1 MW in Greece. I will send a movie of it to the clown and 
to Peter Ekstrom , maybe they will join together to find the way to explain to 
the persons that will utilize the plant that it does not work, because they saw 
it in the movie!
By the way: we made as well tests heating water, without phase change, and the 
efficiency has been the same, as published. Anyway, let me set up a good 
operating plant, and all the snakes, clowns and movie-professors will be swept 
away; their arms are chatters (and movies too), my arms are working plants.
…and I have a surprise…but it will come in October.
Warm regards,

Reply via email to