Lawrence, the definition of movie clown is to make conclusive deductions from low resolution video footage without knowing what is a) surrounding temperature b) temperature of the hose and c) current power output of E-Cat.
There was just too many unknowns to make strong conclusions. Pseudoscepticism was even reinforced by lack of explanation how steam can be wet AND two centigrades above boiling point. Ignoring this kind of simple detail and replacing it with conspiracy theory, is sure sign of pseudoskepticism. —Jouni Ps. as i suggested steam temperature is very easy to fake. Energy can also be from chemical sources, they are not excluded. But this not what was said but asumption was that there was just two orders of magnitude measurement error what is just ridiculous. On Jun 29, 2011 5:33 PM, "Stephen A. Lawrence" <sa...@pobox.com> wrote: > > > On 11-06-29 10:23 AM, Jouni Valkonen wrote: >> >> Very good response by Andrea. We see that those "movie clowns" have >> also infiltrated Vortex, like Joshua, Abd and few other pseudoskeptics. >> > > So Abd is a "pseudoskeptic" because he questioned the dryness of the > steam, and asked if it's possible the thing is ejecting liquid water? > > Sounds like somebody has widened the definition of the term a bit. > > Jouni, "pseudoskeptic" doesn't mean "I don't like you", which is how you > just used the term. > > And calling Abd and Joshua "movie clowns" is just an empty ad hominem, > just as it was when used by Rossi himself. > >
