On Aug 21, 2011, at 10:09 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Horace Heffner
<[email protected]> wrote:
OK, maybe you are right about the precise phrase "did not pay",
though I
feel I have read that phrase in this regard somewhere.
I think the issue stems from this thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg50332.html
I think there is a safety stability issue and there is a dispute over
the term 'stability'. You know, like "It depends on what 'is' is."
T
Say, that appears to be the Aug 10, 2011, Angela Kemmler reference I
just quoted. Not only that, I overlooked the phrase "did not pay" in
the sentence: "Just saw this citation on a swedish website, it may
help to explain why Defkalion did not pay EFA srl (Rossis wife), and
Rossi was upset", which Angela Kemmler wrote. So, it is not merely
my memory that is going with age ... it is my competence as well.
A failure to demonstrate the "... full working stability of the
reactor" strikes me as clearly a technological issue. However, this
is in direct conflict with Rossi's statement that "... the issue is
just financial, not personal, nor technological, nor scientific."
I see that according to the following reference "Defkalion denies
this text originated from them, but they do not specifically deny its
contents.":
http://www.energikatalysatorn.se/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=217&start=110
http://tinyurl.com/3wqcpgb
I also see there was more speculative information, as well as direct
quotes of Rossi, referenced by Akira Shirakawa:
http://pesn.com/
2011/08/09/9501890_Rossi_Gives_Reason_for_Split_from_Defkalion/
http://tinyurl.com/3hb225l
Therein is a quote of Rossi: "The problem emerged when, after we
waited until the maximum possible term, we demanded that the
financial duties be respected. At that point it emerged that the
financial resources were not enough to go on. This is the sole real
problem."
The original Rossi text for that can be found at:
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=501&cpage=10#comment-60231
http://tinyurl.com/3d3ea5d
It is not clear what "financial duties" means. It is reasonable to
infer that it has to do with a payment, but it could also mean
failure to create an escrow or to provide a suitable financial
report, etc. The statement "Defkalion did not pay EFA srl (Rossis
wife)...", noted above, seems to be based on more specific
information than Rossi himself provides in the above references.
I guess I am merely reviewing information with which others are most
familiar. I have been unable to read posts for a number of weeks, so
am catching up here.
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
