On Aug 31, 2011, at 10:38 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Horace Heffner <[email protected]> wrote:
The public demonstrations to date prove nothing because the methods
used are so flawed.
That is incorrect. As Rossi and I have pointed out many times, if
there were flaws in the steam test, the flowing water test would
have revealed them. Since it showed even more heat than the steam
test with this same device, that proves the steam test methodology
is sound.
- Jed
Under which shell is that pea?
The flowing water test was not public as far as I know. Where is
the report showing the data etc.?
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
