Horace wrote: «What you say might be true if the public tests were reasonably well done. They weren't. There is thus no reason to believe closed door results were done any more competently unless sufficient information is published to make that determination.»
This is not the case. There was nothing wrong with the experimental setup, because they were done in open manner that Rossi invited independ scientists to do the measurements, but non of them thought that calorimetry is necessary. Even Mats Lewan failed to do this although he had all the resources to do proper calorimetri. Also Lewan had careful preparatio, unlike Kullander and Essén, who did not know what to expect. Actually I asked less than a month ago and Lewan still thinks that calorimery was not necessary and his method was sound. That Jed's "expert" was not expert at all that he would have expert knowledge from E-Cat. He just stated general and obvious fact that all water boilers on Earth produce dry steam, because there is now such physical concept as "wet steam" in steam physics that is anyway relevant with E-Cat. Expert was just asked does he think that steam was very wet and he replied that it was not wet steam because wet steam is not stable physical state of water in close to normal pressures. (Frankly I still wonder who was the first crack potter who introduced the concept Wet Steam, because it is physically inaccurate concept. At least if someone could provide a reference that descripes experimental setup that produces wet steam, because no one here at vortex has ever seen wet steam, but they just assume it.) Point is that you are wrong along with Krivit that we would not have any means to do calorimetry retrospectively. Please review my last post. Also you should review the report for December test and ignore what Levi did calculate and make your own proper calculations. If you cannot come up with method of calculating enthalpy in creative way, then it is your problem. But you are in the situation that no expert knowledge does help you, but you need to come up something creative. Although, being creative is not that easy. In summary, Rossi is completely innocent for lack of calorimetry. He did not have any influence on enthalpy measurements, because measuring enthalpy was task assigned for independent scientists such as Levi and Lewan. —Jouni Ps. I agree, that 18 hour test gave probably too high power output. It is probably off the mark by factor of two. There is simple physics that 130kW output would have lead into core melt down, because stailess steal is not fast enough heat conductor.
