2011/9/1 Horace Heffner <[email protected]>: > Lying is not an important issue with the public tests.
What if there was a hidden hydrogen bottle? 200 grams of hydrogen is enough. > The issue is whether > the calorimetry showed anything at all. Indeed, it showed. I will return this issue tomorrow. > The issue is a relative humidity > probe does not measure steam quality, or sense whether large amounts of > water are overflowing. This silly measurement has nothing to do with Rossi, but all to do with Galantini. > The issue is the use of a set-up that is perfect for > self delusion and erroneous results, and proves nothing. > This is untrue. It is almost trivial to measure enthalpy from steam by sparging. See my recent experiment in other threat. Therefore experimental setup was correct. > Such major flaws are > not an indication of an appropriate level of science being > applied. > You should tell this to Levi, Passerini, Bianchini, Galantini, Kullander, Essén, Lewan and various other persons who all failed with calorimetry. Frankly I am stunned when I realized how simple science calorimetry is and how poorly it was conducted during the demonstrations AND in various discussion forums. Lewan had extensive public discussion what to measure before he went to Bologna. He even measured electromagnetic radiation for heat transfer but no one suggested for him to do simple steam sparging calorimetry. This is what surprises me the most. And also Rossi was only passive observer when scientist made all the measurements what they thought to be necessary. Therefore no-one cannot state any objections for Rossi if the level of science was poor. –Jouni
