Widom-Larsen reaches into a bag of tricks, not plauibility. The theory is uncritiqued and suffers from numerous flaws which render it totally untenable. The other theories mentioned are untenable as well, some by their own admission. As for the others, proud exclamation is not what I want in a theory. I believe you've misunderstood me to mean that I'd entertain a Coulomb barrier lowering theory. In a sense I already have but such a theory has little to do with my view of posssible proton nickel fusion. Its not my view that barrier lowering is necessary. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, September 04, 2011 1:08 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:The Rossi Radiowave Reactor


Joe Catania [mailto:[email protected]] wrote:
I'm not sanguine on any of the theories popularized
so far like Widom-Larsen, Rossi's theories, Piantelli's,
BEC, etc. They've all been discredited.

'Discredited' how???
Please don't say, "Because they contradict current theories"...

Are there any hypotheses that you are sanguine about???

Do you have your own hypothesis??? Don't be shy...

-Mark




Reply via email to