Widom-Larsen reaches into a bag of tricks, not plauibility. The theory is
uncritiqued and suffers from numerous flaws which render it totally
untenable. The other theories mentioned are untenable as well, some by their
own admission. As for the others, proud exclamation is not what I want in a
theory. I believe you've misunderstood me to mean that I'd entertain a
Coulomb barrier lowering theory. In a sense I already have but such a theory
has little to do with my view of posssible proton nickel fusion. Its not my
view that barrier lowering is necessary.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, September 04, 2011 1:08 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:The Rossi Radiowave Reactor
Joe Catania [mailto:[email protected]] wrote:
I'm not sanguine on any of the theories popularized
so far like Widom-Larsen, Rossi's theories, Piantelli's,
BEC, etc. They've all been discredited.
'Discredited' how???
Please don't say, "Because they contradict current theories"...
Are there any hypotheses that you are sanguine about???
Do you have your own hypothesis??? Don't be shy...
-Mark