Am 08.10.2011 22:18, schrieb Jed Rothwell:
Peter Heckert <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    I expect he did use it to heat an office. That does not mean he
    knows how to do it again.
    He has always given the impression, that he can.


I do not get that impression. He says he is trying to commercialize as soon as possible. He says that is his principal goal. For some inexplicable reason, he feels that in order to do that, he must make a 1 MW reactor. He says he is bending every effort to accomplish these goals. But I have never heard him say he could be making commercially useful heaters now.
Then you do not listen what he says. Examples for this are overwhelming in count and content.
One example: A household sized ecat device is on market in january.
Even the costs are known: 2000$/kW
He said he made one years ago. I assume it was a fluke, or something he could not reproduce. Such things are common in this kind of research. As I said, Mizuno saw a dramatic reaction and spent years trying to make it happen again. So did Yamaguchi. They both failed.
Dramatic reactions are not evident. Hydrogen explosions as in Fukushima are dramatic events. The explosion energy was low and it was not nuclear. On electrolysis or in the ecat, the material could -after a long period of experiments- absorb anomalous amounts of hydrogen or getter energy which are then released in a short period of time.

Of course this would be remarkable and would be worth a scientific investigation but it is not an anomalous nuclear reaction.

Peter

Reply via email to