Robert Leguillon <robert.leguil...@hotmail.com> wrote: Let's now take this to its logical conclusion. > At a primary flow rate of .91 g/s, the evidence makes it look as though the > average power (including the power applied by the band heater) over the > entire span, could not have been over 2.5 kW. Anything higher would have > resulted in higher E-Cat temps than its 124C . . .
Lewan already said this in his report. It is not clear that was the max flow rate, or that it did not change. The secondary loop flow rate did not change. - Jed
