Do I get a "device that generates frequencies"?
> Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 11:16:48 -0400
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Please stop making unsupported, physically impossible
> assertions about stored heat
> From: hveeder...@gmail.com
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
>
> Pour some boiling water into a thermos. For how long does the water
> continue to boil?
> Harry
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Robert Leguillon
> <robert.leguil...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > Jed,
> > Don't miss the fundamental argument of heat storage.
> > Great care was taken to insulate the E-Cat, and keep heat from escaping. If
> > you think that this is impossible, I have an experiment for you. Make a
> > scalding hot 1/2 cup of coffee. Put it into a Thermos. See how long it
> > takes to cool.
> > Repeat the experiment with a larger volume of coffee.
> > People are saying that 20 liters of boiling water in a container
> > specifically designed to hold heat, surrounding large hunks of metal
> > exceeding 124C (after all, they must be hotter than the water to heat it)
> > has stored energy.
> > Rossi, in one of the videos or his blog (can't remember) said there was
> > about 20 liters of water. At .91 s/g flow rate, it would take more than 6
> > hours to replace the water in the E-Cat.
> > Think eye-dropper of cold water into a scalding hot pot.
> > You come across as demeaning when you dismiss these arguments for "violating
> > the laws of physics."
> > The only temperature increases that you are seeing are on the secondary,
> > which necessarily must be incorrect. More than likely, HH is right, and the
> > changes seen are the results of slugs of hot water overflowing the E-Cat.
> > The measurements at the secondary MUST BE incorrect. If the measurements
> > are correct, the E-Cat would run dry and the temperature would have to rise.
> >
>
