How much power does this frequency device need? Harry
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Robert Leguillon <[email protected]> wrote: > Do I get a "device that generates frequencies"? > >> Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 11:16:48 -0400 >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Please stop making unsupported, physically impossible >> assertions about stored heat >> From: [email protected] >> To: [email protected] >> >> Pour some boiling water into a thermos. For how long does the water >> continue to boil? >> Harry >> >> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Robert Leguillon >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Jed, >> > Don't miss the fundamental argument of heat storage. >> > Great care was taken to insulate the E-Cat, and keep heat from >> > escaping. If >> > you think that this is impossible, I have an experiment for you. Make a >> > scalding hot 1/2 cup of coffee. Put it into a Thermos. See how long it >> > takes to cool. >> > Repeat the experiment with a larger volume of coffee. >> > People are saying that 20 liters of boiling water in a container >> > specifically designed to hold heat, surrounding large hunks of metal >> > exceeding 124C (after all, they must be hotter than the water to heat >> > it) >> > has stored energy. >> > Rossi, in one of the videos or his blog (can't remember) said there was >> > about 20 liters of water. At .91 s/g flow rate, it would take more than >> > 6 >> > hours to replace the water in the E-Cat. >> > Think eye-dropper of cold water into a scalding hot pot. >> > You come across as demeaning when you dismiss these arguments for >> > "violating >> > the laws of physics." >> > The only temperature increases that you are seeing are on the secondary, >> > which necessarily must be incorrect. More than likely, HH is right, and >> > the >> > changes seen are the results of slugs of hot water overflowing the >> > E-Cat. >> > The measurements at the secondary MUST BE incorrect. If the >> > measurements >> > are correct, the E-Cat would run dry and the temperature would have to >> > rise. >> > >> >
