Heckert, why don't you go stand on a corner with a tin cup. Yes skin effect
is important at high frequencies especiall in the case of certain pulse
shapes. I'm a physicist and I happen to have intimate knowledge of just hgow
important skin effect can be. Inductive reactance isn't just proportional to
inductance its proportional to frequency as well. No doubt there may be
considerable iron nearby the current. Alternating electric and magnetic
fields can induce electric polarization and eddie currents which can
dissiapte heat.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Heckert" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 2:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Energy Analyzer for E-Cat
Am 12.10.2011 20:00, schrieb Joe Catania:
Nonsense, high frequencies are subject to skin effect.
So you have studied electrical engineering?
I have. Unfortunately I dont know the proper english expressions to
explain this, but it is trivial, anyway.....
For these frequencies that are in question here and with those thick
cables you can almost forget the skin effect.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Heckert"
<[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 1:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Energy Analyzer for E-Cat
Am 12.10.2011 18:39, schrieb Joe Catania:
http://www.omega.com/heaters/pdf/HEATER_INTRO_BAND_REF.pdf, as you can
see this one uses a coiled wire. If not designed properly this could
have high inductance.
If you suceed to make a remarkably high inductance without an iron core,
then you should patent and market this.
You will get rich and famous.
Also Lewan say he injects high frequency at one point.
A series inductance will shift the current phase and reduce the power.
Power maximum is, when inductance is zero.
This is even more true with high frequencies.
Kind regards,
Peter
----- Original Message ----- From: "Terry Blanton" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 12:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Energy Analyzer for E-Cat
Yep, it's called power factor. You're really on top of things, Joe!
T
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Joe Catania <[email protected]>
wrote:
It occurs to me that the means they are using to measure power is
prone to
error. An energy analyzer would be the best way to do it. If there's
any
reactance in the circuit they power calculations they use would be
inaccurate.
