On 11-10-12 03:38 PM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Another possibility is to make a small modification to each component:
Measure the flow rate a little bit wrong, measure temperatures a
little bit wrong, calculate a little bit wrong, introduce so much
errors and inaccuracies that a single one -if discovered- would prove
nothing, but all together make an energy gain.
And make sure everything is always as complicated as possible. To make
the thermal signature more obvious, don't just make better measurements
-- add a heat exchanger, instead! Then you've got twice as many
components to mis-measure!
This has been the problem all along -- everything is sloppy, Rossi's
statements are often inaccurate or confusing, there's a little bit of
what might be outright lying going on (e.g., the dry steam in the early
tests, the undetectable isotope shifts, the factory heating system which
nobody but Rossi ever saw), and it all adds up to a blurry picture which
is never, never cleared up, no matter how many times Rossi seems to set
out to do so.
Is it because Rossi's just a brilliant turkey who can solve problems
nobody else can get a grip on yet somehow can't understand how to
produce a clean demonstration, or is it something more sinister?
