If he is a real talented chaos experimenter who doesnt doublecheck and who doesnt make plausibility tests, as this seems to be the case, then he might have done just this with a long series of dilletantic experiments and he could really believe in the energy production.Another possibility is to make a small modification to each component:Measure the flow rate a little bit wrong, measure temperatures a little bit wrong, calculate a little bit wrong, introduce so much errors and inaccuracies that a single one -if discovered- would prove nothing, but all together make an energy gain.
- [Vo]:Energy Analyzer for E-Cat Joe Catania
- Re: [Vo]:Energy Analyzer for E-Cat Terry Blanton
- Re: [Vo]:Energy Analyzer for E-Cat Joe Catania
- Re: [Vo]:Energy Analyzer for E-Cat Peter Heckert
- Re: [Vo]:Energy Analyzer for E-Cat Joe Catania
- Re: [Vo]:Energy Analyzer for E-C... Peter Heckert
- Re: [Vo]:Energy Analyzer for... Joe Catania
- Re: [Vo]:Energy Analyzer... Peter Heckert
- Re: [Vo]:Energy Analyzer... Peter Heckert
- Re: [Vo]:Energy Analyzer... Joe Catania
- Re: [Vo]:Energy Analyzer... Stephen A. Lawrence
- Re: [Vo]:Energy Analyzer... Jed Rothwell
- RE: [Vo]:Energy Analyzer... Robert Leguillon
- Re: [Vo]:Energy Analyzer... Joe Catania
- Re: [Vo]:Energy Analyzer... Roarty, Francis X
- RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Energy An... Roarty, Francis X
- Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Energ... Joe Catania
- Re: [Vo]:Energy Analyzer for E-Cat Jouni Valkonen
- Re: [Vo]:Energy Analyzer for E-Cat Alan J Fletcher

