"> I do not think Rossi was lying about dry steam. He says he does not know > much about how to measure steam quality. He assumed that Galantini knew > what he was doing. I still do assume that. Many people here have been > yelling about this but experts I have heard from say it was dry." The wet vs dry steam argument lost all meaning in those early demonstrations, once the masses understood that the E-Cat could be pouring water out the hose and into the drain.
> Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 16:11:21 -0400 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Energy Analyzer for E-Cat > > Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: > > > This has been the problem all along -- everything is sloppy, Rossi's > > statements are often inaccurate or confusing, there's a little bit of > > what might be outright lying going on (e.g., the dry steam in the > > early tests, the undetectable isotope shifts, the factory heating > > system which nobody but Rossi ever saw) . . . > > I agree with the part about "sloppy" and "isotope shifts," but Focardi > and others say they saw the factory heating system. > > I do not think Rossi was lying about dry steam. He says he does not know > much about how to measure steam quality. He assumed that Galantini knew > what he was doing. I still do assume that. Many people here have been > yelling about this but experts I have heard from say it was dry. > > Rossi is flamboyant and quick to anger, so he makes himself look bad. > His behavior magnifies his faults. Some people, such as the late John > Maddox, have the opposite quality. They give a good impression. They > speak well with a polished, professional demeanor. They come across as > authorities. You feel you should trust them. It turns they do not know > what they're talking about, but they give a good impression, so many > people believe them. > > - Jed >
