On Oct 15, 2011, at 2:05 AM, Robert Lynn wrote:
Look in the Temp data Ecat_6_10_11.xls file on nyteknic site at
11:22:01,
Could you post a link please?
It does disagree with Mat's report, and it is possible there was a
transcription error or somesuch. Note that the secondary water
flow started at 11:00
On 14 October 2011 20:12, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote:
Robert Lynn wrote:
It is really perturbing that the initial temperature measurements
up to about 11:50 have a 4.3°C temperature difference between the
inlet and outlet of the secondary, and even at max power it only
rises to about 7.2°C - obviously a huge temperature error, which in
itself and alone makes all the secondary loop data totally unreliable.
Where do you see that? At 11:52 the log shows a Delta T of negative
0.5°C. That is a bias that they did not bother to adjust. It ranges
from 0.5 to 0.7°C.
I do not see any signs of "huge temperature errors." What are you
talking about? Please refer to the specific statements in the log
here:
http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3284962.ece/BINARY/Test+of+E-
cat+October+6+%28pdf%29
- Jed
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
