Robert Lynn <[email protected]> wrote: Look in the Temp data Ecat_6_10_11.xls file on nyteknic site at 11:22:01, It > does disagree with Mat's report, and it is possible there was a > transcription error or somesuch. Note that the secondary water flow started > at 11:00
That is: http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3284968.ece/BINARY/Temp+data+Ecat_6_10_11+%28xls%29 The report is the original source. This is a transcription error. He accidentally copied the T2 value, 29.9°C. This is supposed to be 24.6°C. - Jed
