Maybe you have an error with your simulation since the number does not seem to match the real world results. What kind of flow did you assume in the primary? I think that vapor condensation is where the most action is since that takes so much more energy than cooling the hot condensed liquid. I wish someone would have been wise enough to place the thermocouple well.
Dave -----Original Message----- From: Alan J Fletcher <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Wed, Oct 26, 2011 6:49 pm Subject: [Vo]:Manifold mispositioning makes measurements meaningless I have built a SPICE circuit simulation model of the manifold --- and he results are VERY BAD !!!! An initial small-scale model indicates that the ENTIRE top of the anifold is "contaminated" by the HOT side. Even with a "stepped" manifold (representing the various pipe ittings) , and with the thermocouple at the END of the tube, I get a 0 C ERROR !!!!! My preliminary results are at : ttp://lenr.qumbu.com/rossi_ecat_oct11_spice.php I can make a more accurate model with Spice, but a Finite Element odel is clearly needed. (lenr.qumbu.com -- analyzing the Rossi/Focardi eCat -- Hi, google!)
