I agree with Berke. Rossi is have a good laugh at our expense. If the public report is falsified, then it is a scam, pure and simple. Otherwise, it is real as many expect.
Dave -----Original Message----- From: Robert Leguillon <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Mon, Nov 7, 2011 8:53 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Minor progress The issue of complete vaporization has plagued the E-Cat from the beginning. In he early E-Cats, water was able to run straight out of the E-Cat and down a rain, without ever being collected or sparged. In the 1MW demo, the steam is ondensed and fed back in, there is no way of knowing how much water was ctually vaporized. s has been discussed ad nauseum, the stability of the temperature is the best ndication that the water is pegged to a stable boiling point, and NOT being ompletely vaporized. inimal back pressure can explain the elevated boiling point. Berke Durak <[email protected]> wrote: >On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Colin Hercus <[email protected]> wrote: > Or 25kg per module if we just bring the water to 105C and make very little > steam But that assumes that the numbers are falsified. In the customer's public report, it says : Water vaporized : 3716 l. So if that figure is false, anything goes and there is nothing left to investigate. You have to put faith in something, otherwise it is pointless to discuss - just call it a scam and move on. -- Berke Durak
