By assuming that all of the water pumped in was evaporated. Unfortunately, it was fed into the steam condensers and back into the E-Cat in a closed loop. This us why the October 6th test was so important. It stood the chance to produce viable calorimetry. Unfortunately, the placement of the secondary thermocouples bring the results into question
Berke Durak <[email protected]> wrote: >On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 8:53 PM, Robert Leguillon ><[email protected]> wrote: > >> The issue of complete vaporization has plagued the E-Cat from the >> beginning. In the early E-Cats, water was able to run straight out >> of the E-Cat and down a drain, without ever being collected or >> sparged. In the 1MW demo, the steam is condensed and fed back in, >> there is no way of knowing how much water was actually vaporized. > >How did they get the 3716 liters of vaporized water figure then? >-- >Berke Durak > >
