Apparently not known yet but there are so many possibilities. I also saw recently that Chernobyl is badly in need of a new concrete encasement but no money to do it. I hope the era of power by fission is coming to a close.
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > *From:* Jeff Sutton **** > > ** ** > > **Ø **It was intended to be humorous....**** > > ** ** > > Yes, there was no doubt about your intent. **** > > ** ** > > But since you were not around vortex (AFAIK) when we were considering > tellurium as the Rossi catalyst – then it seems prudent to “air out” this > particular detail, so to speak… J**** > > ** ** > > The history of advancement in many fields is littered with people being > “right for the wrong reason’… I hope this is not in that category, and > admittedly there is little chance that it is. **** > > ** ** > > Nevertheless, we should cover all the bases. **** > > ** ** > > Where did that iodine come from anyway?**** > > ** ** > > Now, if someone did an analysis of prevailing winds in Europe over the > last week, and it pointed back to where else, the birthplace of baloney, > then that might make the discussion more interesting. **** > > ** ** > > Doubt if there is a connection, but who would have thought the worst > problems of Chernobyl would end up in places like Scotland and Finland?*** > * > > ** ** > > Jones**** > > ** ** >
