Mary Yugo <[email protected]> wrote: They did not say they had a prototype lab. They said they had a factory. >> >> >> Do you have evidence they do not? >> > > Oh come on! YOU know better than THAT! Like it's my job to disprove > their extravagant claims? >
Many companies do have factories, so this claim is not extravagant. It is quite the normal thing for an industrial company to have a factory. You say it is not your job to prove or disprove their claims. If you are going to publish accusations that Rossi is committing fraud or that Defkalion does not have a factory, then you have made it your job to back up these accusations. You need to provide some sort of evidence, or point to a credible published source elsewhere. This forum is not a supermarket checkout tabloid. It is not a place for you to spread unfounded rumors that people are engaged in criminal activities. I think Bill Beaty should ask you to stop. If you insist on saying these things, even though you do not have a shred of evidence, I suggest you include a disclaimer: "this is only my gut feeling, and I have no actual information but . . ." That will put things in perspective. OK-- you deserve this: prove I don't have a pink invisible flying > unicorn in my garage and that it keeps my house warm with moving its wings > all winter. > It is not likely anyone has a unicorn, whereas having a factory is normal. More to the point, having a unicorn would not be criminal, whereas if Defkalion is lying about the factory that is a serious misrepresentation of their business prospects. In the U.S. that would be a serious violation of SEC regulations. Talking about unicorns is light-hearted banter. What you are doing is libelous. That is a *serious matter*, especially in a field such as cold fusion, where vicious, false accusations of fraud have ruined the lives of researchers, and held back progress for 22 years. You need to stop the damn nonsense. - Jed
